Evidence for relativistic effects in the construal of transitive events

During the last two decades, experimental evidence for language-mediated effects on cognition has surfaced in numerous studies. These studies relate to semantic fields as diverse as number, gender, spatial orientation, and color, inter alia. One subject that has received relatively little attention in such experimental research is the potential for relativistic effects on event construal. In this study we present evidence for such effects, by considering differing event discrimination strategies across two populations. The first of these is comprised of speakers of a language, Karitiâna, which obligatorily indexes verbs according to whether they denote semantically intransitive or semantically transitive events. The second of these is comprised of speakers of a language, English, whose grammar does not appeal to the distinction in the same manner. A triad-discrimination task was utilized to assess the rates at which Karitiâna speakers discriminate actions in a ‘transitivity-oriented' fashion. The results of the task suggest that Karitiâna speakers evince heightened transitivity-orientation when contrasted to English speakers. The results are generally consistent with a relativistic account. 

Key words: linguistic relativity, transitivity, ergativity, perception, Karitiâna

References

Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition 118: 126-132.

Dixon, R.M.W. (1988). A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Dixon, R.M.W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP.

Drivonikou, G.V., Kay, P., Regier, T., Ivry, R.B., Gilbert, A.L., Franklin, A. & Davies, I.R.L. (2007). Further evidence that Whorfian effects are stronger in the right hemisphere than the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 1097-1102.

Everett, C. (2013a). Without language, no distinctly human numerosity: Reply to Coolidge and Overmann. Current Anthropology 54: 81-82.

Everett, C. (2013b). Linguistic relativity: Evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Everett, C. (2010). Negation and the untransitive category in Karitiâna Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 35: 379-390.

Everett, C. (2006). Patterns in Karitiâna: Articulation, Perception, and Grammar. PhD dissertation, Rice University.

Everett, C., & Madora, K. (2012). Quantity recognition among speakers of an anumeric language. Cognitive Science 36: 130-141.

Flaherty, M. (2001). How a language gender system creeps in perception. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 32: 18-31.

Gilbert, A., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R.B. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 489-494.

Givón, T. (2001). Syntax, Volume II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Imai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2007). Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology: Revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity. Cognitive Science 31: 385-414.

Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume I. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume II. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Levinson, S. (2003). Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: CUP.

Levinson, S, Kita, S., Haun, D., & Rasch, B. (2002). Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition 84: 155-188.

Lucy, J., & Gaskins, S. (2001). Grammatical categories and classification preferences. In M. Bowerman and S. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: CUP. pp. 257-283. 

Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2001). Motion events in language and cognition. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Payne, T.  (1997). Describing Morphosyntax.  Cambridge: CUP.

Regier, T., & Zheng, M. (2007). Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705-719.

Download

Download full text of the article as PDF